Three major steps toward the conservation of freshwater and riparian biodiversity.

Freshwater ecosystems and their bordering wetlands and riparian zones are vital for human society and biological diversity. Yet, they are among the most degraded ecosystems, where sharp declines in biodiversity are driven by human activities, such as hydropower development, agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. Because freshwater ecosystems are characterized by strongly reciprocal linkages with surrounding landscapes, human activities that encroach on or degrade riparian zones ultimately lead to declines in freshwater-riparian ecosystem functioning. We synthesized results of a symposium on freshwater, riparian, and wetland processes and interactions and analyzed some of the major problems associated with improving freshwater and riparian research and management. Three distinct barriers are the lack of involvement of local people in conservation research and management, absence of adequate measurement of biodiversity in freshwater and riparian ecosystems, and separate legislation and policy on riparian and freshwater management. Based on our findings, we argue that freshwater and riparian research and conservation efforts should be integrated more explicitly. Best practices for overcoming the 3 major barriers to improved conservation include more and sustainable use of traditional and other forms of local ecological knowledge, choosing appropriate metrics for ecological research and monitoring of restoration efforts, and mirroring the close links between riparian and freshwater ecosystems in legislation and policy. Integrating these 3 angles in conservation science and practice will provide substantial benefits in addressing the freshwater biodiversity crisis.

Tres grandes pasos hacia la conservación de la biodiversidad ribereña y de agua dulce Resumen Los ecosistemas de agua dulce y los humedales y zonas ribereñas que los bordean son vitales para la sociedad y la biodiversidad. Sin embargo, se encuentran entre los ecosistemas más degradados en donde las declinaciones graves de la biodiversidad son causadas por actividades humanas como el desarrollo hidroeléctrico, la agricultura, la silvicultura y las pesquerías. Puesto que los ecosistemas de agua dulce se caracterizan por tener un vínculo recíproco con los paisajes que los rodean, las actividades humanas que invaden o degradan las zonas ribereñas terminan en la declinación del funcionamiento del ecosistema ribereño de agua dulce. Sintetizamos los resultados de un simposio sobre los procesos e interacciones de agua dulce, ribereños y de humedales y analizamos algunos de los principales problemas asociados con la mejora de la investigación y gestión de agua dulce y ríos. Tres barreras claras son la falta de participación de la población local en la investigación y gestión de la conservación, la ausencia de una medición adecuada de la biodiversidad en los ecosistemas de agua dulce y ribereños, y una legislación y política separadas sobre la gestión ribereña y de agua dulce. Con base en nuestros hallazgos, argumentamos que la investigación y los esfuerzos de conservación de agua dulce y ríos deberían integrarse de manera más explícita. Las mejores prácticas para sobreponerse a las tres grandes barreras incluyen un mayor uso sustentable de los conocimientos tradicionales y otras formas de conocimiento, la selección de medidas apropiadas para la investigación ecológica y el monitoreo de los esfuerzos de restauración y la replicación de los vínculos cercanos entre los ecosistemas ribereños y de agua dulce en la legislación y en las políticas. La integración de estos tres ángulos dentro de las ciencias y prácticas de conservación proporcionará beneficios importantes en la manera de abordar la crisis de la biodiversidad de agua dulce.

Foraging decisions with conservation consequences: Interaction between beavers and invasive tree species.

Herbivore species can either hinder or accelerate the invasion of woody species through selective utilization. Therefore, an exploration of foraging decisions can contribute to the understanding and forecasting of woody plant invasions. Despite the large distribution range and rapidly growing abundance of beaver species across the Northern Hemisphere, only a few studies focus on the interaction between beavers and invasive woody plants.We collected data on the woody plant supply and utilization at 20 study sites in Hungary, at two fixed distances from the water. The following parameters were registered: taxon, trunk diameter, type of utilization, and carving depth. Altogether 5401 units (trunks and thick branches) were identified individually. We developed a statistical protocol that uses a dual approach, combining whole-database and transect-level analyses to examine foraging strategy.Taxon, diameter, and distance from water all had a significant effect on foraging decisions. The order of preference for the four most abundant taxa was Populus spp. (softwood), Salix spp. (softwood), Fraxinus pennsylvanica (invasive hardwood), and Acer negundo (invasive hardwood). The diameter influenced the type of utilization, as units with greater diameter were rather carved or debarked than felled. According to the central-place foraging strategy, the intensity of the foraging decreased with the distance from the water, while both the taxon and diameter selectivity increased. This suggests stronger modification of the woody vegetation directly along the waterbank, together with a weaker impact further from the water.In contrast to invasive trees, for which utilization occurred almost exclusively in the smallest diameter class, even the largest softwood trees were utilized by means of carving and debarking. This may lead to the gradual loss of softwoods or the transformation of them into shrubby forms. After the return of the beaver, mature stages of softwood stands and thus the structural heterogeneity of floodplain woody vegetation could be supported by the maintenance of sufficiently large active floodplains.The beaver accelerates the shift of the canopy layer's species composition toward invasive hardwood species, supporting the enemy release hypothesis. However, the long-term impact will also depend on how plants respond to different types of utilization and on their ability to regenerate, which are still unexplored issues in this environment. Our results should be integrated with knowledge about factors influencing the competitiveness of the studied native and invasive woody species to support floodplain conservation and reconstruction.

Local knowledge about a newly reintroduced, rapidly spreading species (Eurasian beaver) and perception of its impact on ecosystem services.

Conflicts caused by reintroduced native species are increasing; however, there is a knowledge gap concerning ecological knowledge and perception of local community members regarding the impact of these species on local ecosystem services and livelihoods. We studied local knowledge about beavers and the perception of their impact on ecosystem services and local livelihoods, and the perception of their general harmfulness and usefulness in Hungary and Romania in three ecologically distinct, diverse rural landscapes. Structured interviews were carried out with 45 knowledgeable and 45 randomly selected local informants. We found that locals were knowledgeable about legal status, biology and behavior of beavers and their diverse impact on nature and ecosystem services. Perceptions included mostly negative impacts on provisioning services, while both negative and positive impacts on regulating and cultural services were perceived, including some contradictory impacts of the species. In spite of the actual and anticipated potential future harms caused by beavers, most people appreciated its precise building mastery and 'cute' nature. We argue that communication between nature conservationists and locals should reflect this complexity of perceptions, while reciprocal learning could help to moderate local conflicts and develop adaptive management strategies.